stevehartflorida.com

A little snark and life on this big ol' sandbar…

Home » Posts tagged "President Obama"

What if…we really had a way to create jobs, improve Florida’s economy.

 What if…

410,000 companies inFloridasaw payroll taxes cut in half?

We invested almost $1.6 billion to improveFlorida’s highways and transit system and, in the process, created 20,500 new jobs?

We invested nearly $1.7 billion to save and additionally support nearly 26,000Floridateachers, police officers and fire fighters?

We spent nearly $1.3 billion to upgrade Floridaschools to 21st Century standards while, in the process, created over 16,000 new jobs?

We spent $2.7 billion inFloridato refurbish and retrofit foreclosed homes?

We spent nearly $300 million to augment the job creating work ofFlorida’s community colleges?

We put the 498,000 long-term unemployed workers inFloridaback to work?

We placed 8,800 adults and 35,600 young people inFloridainto jobs through training in growth industries?

We cut the taxes of a typicalFloridahousehold – earning $46,000 a year – by $1,430 through an expansion of the payroll tax cut passed last December?

Let’s see, doing the math…okay, carry the one…that’s about $7.6 billion additional dollars flowing into Florida and almost 600,000 new jobs.

Somehow, I think we’d all say, “yes,” to such a bold investment in ourselves, our communities, our economy, our future.

The good news is we can say yes to these kinds of investments and more. They’re all part of President Obama’s American Jobs Act.

All we need is for the Congress of theUnited Statesto say, “yes,” and pass this bill.

The purpose of the American Jobs Act is simple, according to President Obama: “put more people back to work and put more money in the pockets of working Americans. And…do so without adding a dime to the deficit.”

Sure, you say, “but how would we pay for such a clearly beneficial project? We don’t have any money.”

Actually, we do have money –  or could have the money. President Obama challenged Congress on Monday to cut $4.4 trillion from current spending and press forward on deficit reduction.

The single largest piece of these cuts – approximately $1.5 trillion – will come from tax reform. Everyone agrees the nation’s tax code is in need of reform.

The president wants Congress to lower tax rates, cut wasteful loopholes and tax breaks, reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion and enact the “Buffett Rule” raising taxes on people making more than $1 million a year to bring their tax rates in line with tax rates paid by middle-class families. (That’s the Warren Buffett rule, not the Jimmy Buffet rule…although he, too, will probably see taxes go up.)

Democratic leaders in the Senate have indicated they favor a tax surchage on incomes above $1 million.

The president wants Congress to allow the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 to expire, which will raise $866 billion. He wants to limit the deductions and exclusions of people earning more that $250,000 a year to raise $410 billion. He wants Congress to close loopholes and eliminate special interest tax breaks to raise $300 billion.

He also wants Congress to move forward with the $1.2 trillion in discretionary cuts enacted in the Budget Control Act; approve $580 billion in cuts and reforms to a wide range of mandatory programs; save $1.1 trillion from the drawdown of troops inAfghanistanand transition from a military to a civilian-led mission inIraq. Add to the mix, as well, $430 billion in additional interest savings.

Granted a one-time investment in the American Jobs Act adds to the deficit in 2012 – a bold and risky proposition for a president running for re-election in 2012 – but the project is fully paid for over 10 years and deficit reduction begins in 2013 as the economy grows stronger. Spending cuts-to-revenue ratio for the entire plan (including discretionary cuts) is 2 to 1.

Is it complicated? Sure. Is it bold and courageous? Without question. Can it pass the Congress? It can if the Congress puts our nation ahead of partisan politics.

Watch the President’s Speech to Congress, read more about the American Jobs Bill. 

 

 

Presidential communication changes with the times

Published July 20, 2011 in the Naples (FL) Daily News:

From Teddy Roosevelt’s Bully Pulpit to President Barack Obama’s embrace of social media, presidential communication tends to define communication as a cultural phenomenon.

The public — and policymakers from Capitol Hill to nearly every other level of government and society — tend to listen when a president of the United States communicates. The way in which a president communicates has also become nearly as important as the words written or spoken.

Former presidents George Washington and Thomas Jefferson set a tone for our early days with their letters — hand-written and usually hand-delivered. Abraham Lincoln’s speeches defined our nation in its most troubled times.
The first telephone was installed in the White House in 1877 by Rutherford B. Hayes, a single line running only to the Treasury Department next door.

Regular and frequent telephone calls into and out of the White House would have to wait another 50 years until Herbert Hoover installed the first telephone into the Oval Office.

The age of mass communication between the White House and the American public began famously with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Fireside Chats on the radio. Embracing the earliest form of mass communication, Roosevelt’s effectiveness and success is legendary.

Both FDR and, later, presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson knew how to work the phones effectively and all three effectively used off-the-record conversations with journalists as part of a mass media strategy.

President Johnson famously had three televisions set up in the Oval Office to monitor all three — at the time — major television news organizations.

Perhaps no form of presidential mass communications compares in its effect on the body politic as greatly as the 1960 televised debates between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. The medium became the message and helped determine the outcome of the election.

Live televised speeches directly to the American public have become almost routine for presidents from Kennedy to Obama. And the annual State of the Union address to Congress has become an evening of great television theatre.

Obama’s uses of the “new” forms of social media in 2008 are widely credited with propelling a relatively unknown senator from Illinois to the White House. (Lincoln used trains and debates with Stephen Douglas.)

The Obama administration continues to employ many forms of social media in its daily communications. With a few quick keystrokes, millions of Americans are able to occupy front-row seats in the White House and Eisenhower Executive Office Building.

From its primary Internet portal at www.whitehouse.gov/engage, visitors can subscribe to a wide range of electronic newsletters and blogs, can visit and engage with other Obama administration initiatives like “Let’s Move” or “Joining Forces” or the new “Champions of Change” initiative.

From its Facebook page and Twitter account to its presence on LinkedIN to its White House channel on YouTube and Vimeo, constant uploading of photos to its Flickr account and podcasts on iTunes, the Obama White House is communicating online constantly to millions of Americans just about every aspect of this historic presidency.

“This White House is committed to being the most open and transparent in history,” said Katelyn Sabochik, director of online engagement for the White House Office of Digital Strategy.

Her title and office pretty much says it all. Social media is the message for the Obama administration.

Note to Grinch: Steal Congress this year!

Capitol

We might have a DREAM (Act) someday but don’t ask on Capitol Hill and don’t tell because the questions might prove too taxing on the millionaires in the Congress.

Precious few – if any – are the statesmen and women in our nation’s capital, these days. They are vastly outnumbered and outflanked by reactionaries.

Sure, politics is the art of compromise but this would imply a give-and-take, not just take-and-take-and-block-and-whirl-and-triangulate-and the hell with the best interests of our people.

Children brought to the U.S. by parents outside the legal immigration system still can’t go to most colleges and earn a chance to enter the great melting pot.

Gay folks still can’t be honest about who they are in the military.

And wouldn’t be just freakin’ hilarious if the lawmakers got so twisted up in their own triangulation they simply didn’t get the tax deal passed and millionaires and billionaires ended up with a tax hike, anyway? Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha!!

The Senate just can’t – yet – seem to find the cojones to pass the DREAM Act. Reactionaries keep on the sidelines a repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell but, by golly, they quickly moved to extend their own millionaire tax break for the next two years.

The House of Representatives, still in control of Democrats, moved quickly on the DREAM Act and DADT but have so far balked at the tax deal.

This is fun, isn’t it? Maybe the Grinch could steal Congress this year, instead.

Meanwhile, a Bloomberg Poll of ‘Murkins taken earlier this week suggests only 51 percent of us think we’re better off in 2010 than we were in 2008. (And by, “better off,” the Bloomberg Poll means, “have more money.”)

Only 35 percent responded they are better off today than in 2008. Wanna guess who they are?

The same poll suggested only one-third of those responding support extending tax cuts for millionaires.

Another one-third of the responders say they want to see tax cuts extended for only the middle class and 25 percent of all responders say all tax cuts should expire.

Oh yea…and the poll also suggested the current numbers are better for President Obama than they were for President Reagan in his second year in office. In a poll taken in October 1982, over 60 percent of Americans said they were better off than when Reagan took office.

Reagan won re-election by a landslide in 1984.

Just sayin’.

BREAKING: Cave in at White House!

Sinkhole

In the largest manhunt since the longest war in the U.S. history sought to capture Osama bin Laden, British police rounded up last night notorious information publisher Julian Assange.

Thank God. We can all rest easier now knowing this may put in end to the publication of diplomatic gossip. Of course, I’m not sure now where we’ll get our tidbits about Moammar Gadhafi’s hot Ukranian nurses.

Hmmm…maybe Scotland Yard could help us capture bin Laden.

Oh well, the Assange and Wikileaks case certainly teaches us how the most powerful people in the world can get retribution if you piss ‘em off.

In other BREAKING NEWS on this Pearl Harbor Day, reports continue to surface about a cave in at The White House. Not to worry, the building is still intact. It’s just that the President, himself, appears to have caved in and agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.

Glad we didn’t take seriously all that campaign talk about ending the Bush tax cuts.

But the tax cut deal is good news! We were worried the millionaires and billionaires might have to fork over more of their riches to taxes and help reduce the U.S. debt. Thankfully, they can now go off to St. Bart’s for the holidays without a worry in the world.

Maybe those millionaires and billionaires will spend their holidays dreaming up new jobs for everyone, since the Republicans on Capitol Hill promised that will be the result of extending those tax cuts…as evidenced by the enormous number of jobs created since the tax cuts were enacted in 2003 and 2004. In fact, the millionaires and billionaires are really going to have to think hard to dream up new jobs because jobs already created are so plentiful.

The President, himself, said the tax deal will create “millions of new jobs. “ Paul Krugman, writing today in the New York Times, points to the OCB estimates which suggested extending the Bush tax cuts will reduce uemployment by 0.1 to 0.3. percent in 2011 and twice that in 2012.

But, hey, what’s $700 billion to the budget deficit when we’re reducing unemployment by 0.1 to 0.6 percent?

The good news is what’s left of the middle class will also get to keep its tax cut. The average U.S. household, which has an income of $49,777 will continue to get a tax break of $2,142. A family which earns $311,330 will get to keep $9,318. The President really wanted them to keep only $8,012.

And unemployment pay will continue for one more year for the 9 million Americans considered now chronically unemployed.

But that shouldn’t be a problem because all the millionaires and billionaires spending the holidays down on St. Bart’s will come back with “millions” of jobs for those 9 million people chronically umemployed.

What could possibly go wrong?

Let my taxes go!

LameDuck

Ah, yes, the skies are clear, the air is crisp and chilled and the biennial migration has begun of limping waterfowl toward the swamps and bogs of the Potomac.

Notice the strutting peacocks among the wounded fowl and notice, too, how some ducks are more lame than others.

For Charlie Rangel, the lame duck session in Congress will be more like the lame dip, evade, dodge, sidestep, elude and, maybe, escape session.

“Campaigning is very different from governing,” said President Obama to reporters aboard Air Force One as the giant bird also winged its way back to Washington from Asia.

“All of us learn that. And (the Republicans are) still flush with victory, having run a strategy that was all about saying no. But I am very confident that the American people were not issuing a mandate for gridlock.”

The President, for his part, wants Congress to approve an arms deal with Russia and the Korean trade deal.

But most of the squawking and strutting and plucking will be all about tax cuts: most notably the Bush tax cuts set to expire for the struggling and down-trodden millionaires and billionaires of this country – who, as it turned out, just bought the U.S. House of Representatives on November 2d.

The new owners – the millionaire and billionaire ‘Murkins – really, really want to keep dodging taxes and even though they don’t take formal possession of the House until January they’ll be making sure their pet ducks do all they can over the next couple of weeks to help ‘em out. Little help here!

Oh sure, the deal-making has already begun. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, was all over the Tee Vee Box on Sunday saying maybe tax cuts can be extended for those making less than $1 million a year. What a guy!

But notice something significant: the Congress doesn’t have to do anything on the tax cuts. They could just let them expire. That would be a do-nothing Congress with some actual benefit to the nation.

James Kwak, noted scholar, current Yale Law School student and co-author along with MIT Economist Simon Johnson of the Baseline Scenario, says the Congress should do nothing on the Bush tax cuts.

Says Kwak to the Lame Ducks:

“The question is: Is it better to extend the tax cuts for everyone or for no one? The answer is to extend them for no one.

“The Bush tax cuts have always overwhelmingly benefited the rich, not the middle class, and that is no less true today than when they were enacted. They were bad policy then and they are bad policy today. Extending the tax cuts would dramatically enrich the wealthy relative to everyone else. 65.5 percent of the total benefit would go to the top quintile by income, 26.8 percent to the top 1 percent, and 14.7 percent to the top 0.1 percent.”

Kwak says the single most important non-action the Congress could take would be to let the tax cuts expire – for everyone, rich and middle class – and thereby reduce the federal deficit and help ensure the survival of Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid.

“The CBO (full document, Table 1-7) projects the cost of those tax cuts in 2020 at $368 billion, or 1.6 percent of GDP. The tax cuts mean the difference between a federal deficit of 3.0 percent of GDP (probably sustainable) or 4.6 percent of GDP (probably unsustainable).”

Read the full post here.

It remains to be seen if the Lame Duck Congress also lost its spine in the November elections. How much spine does it take to simply do nothing?

After all, it wouldn’t be the Congress of 2010 that raised taxes. It would be the President Bush and the Republican-controlled Congress in 2001 and 2003 that actually raised taxes on January 1, 2011.

No, no, no…the ditch is just fine.

HateEverbody

One would think, after 234 years, we’d be closer to gettin’ this election thing down.

But one would be wrong.

No matter what we do, we seem intent – at least lately, with the rare exception – on voting ourselves right smack into a deep hole. Quit digging, already, ‘Murka! What are you thinking?

Clearly, we’re not thinking clearly.

Okay, okay, okay…so we decided it’d be a great idea to put the Grand Ol’ Tea Party back in control of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Well, to be honest, we actually put the Huge Corporations and Richest One Percent of ‘Murkins in control of the U.S. House of Representatives. The Grand Ol’ Tea Party is just the front group.

But we thought this would be a good idea because we didn’t seem to like the efforts being made by President Obama and the Democratic congressional majority to fix the disasters left us by the Grand Ol’ Tea Party the last time they were in control.

Disasters…don’t like fixes…let’s try disasters again. Okay, got it. Aye, aye, cap’n…full speed into the hurricane!

Oh yea,…and we did this even though every poll indicates ‘Murkins hate the Republicans even more than they hate the Democrats. And this makes some twisted kind of sense when one considers this stat: 34 percent of all ‘Murkins blame bankers for the Great Recession; of those who blame the bankers, Republicans held an 11 percent advantage over Democrats.

So, let’s review. If indeed, these mid-terms 2010 were all about a referendum on President Obama, let’s review what ‘Murkins don’t like about what Obama has done in his first two years:

  1. We don’t like federal agencies being ordered to indentify and cut wasteful spending.
  2. We don’t like women getting paid the same wages as men.
  3. We don’t like ending the war in Iraq.
  4. We don’t like further research on embryonic stem cells.
  5. We don’t like funding science and research labs.
  6. We don’t like increased spending for crumbling bridges and roads.
  7. We don’t like increased spending for Internet access to schools.
  8. We don’t like new school construction money.
  9. We don’t like closing the Guantanamo gulag.
  10. We don’t like rescuing the U.S. auto industry.
  11. We don’t like that the economic bleeding was stopped and a slowly restoring economy.
  12. We don’t like trying to save mortgages from foreclosure.
  13. We don’t like ending torture.
  14. We don’t like stopping the spread of nuclear weapons around the world and attempts to account for weapons already in existence, reducing them.
  15. We don’t like better body armor for our troops.
  16. We especially don’t like efforts to reduce our man-made contributions to climate change.
  17. We sure didn’t like the Cash-for-Clunckers program because we used up all that money almost overnight.
  18. We don’t like busting Somali pirates on the high seas.
  19. We sure as hell don’t want every American to have access to good health care. Oh, hell no!
  20. We don’t like American Cubans being able to visit their families back in Cuba.
  21. We don’t like closing down offshore tax dodges nor getting the Swiss government to cooperate with U.S. officials on tax cheats who store money in Swiss banks.
  22. We don’t like ending tax breaks for corporations who move jobs to other countries.
  23. We don’t like tax cuts for ourselves.
  24. We don’t like lower drug costs for seniors.
  25. We don’t like consumer protections against predatory credit card companies.
  26. We don’t like children going to college.
  27. We don’t like peace in the Middle East.
  28. We don’t like more loans being made available to small businesses.
  29. We don’t like women on the U.S. Supreme Court, especially Latin women.
  30. We don’t like expanded health care for veterans.
  31. We don’t like holding Seders in the White House and we don’t like acknowledging Muslims.

And that’s just a partial list.

In short, we really don’t like progress and we don’t want our nation to change – ever!

We’re really the Dumbass Party

crazy2

In times like these, I like to quote the esteemed philosopher, Jimmy Buffett:

“If we weren’t all crazy we would go insane.”

Seems the best way to sum up Election 2010 while also adding: Dumbasses.

Really? Have we sunk so low? Have we degenerated so much as a participatory democracy that we can have candidates for the United States Senate don’t understand the First Amendment or Church-State separation; who go on the TeeVee Box to deny being a witch (okay, same candidate).

It’s hard to believe we have candidates for the United States Senate who have thugs set to arrest reporters or stomp the heads of opponents’ supporters.

It’s hard to believe we have candidates for the United States Senate who believe some communities are governed by Sharia Law. (No, no…that’s Shari’s Law and only in the community where Lambchop is mayor.)

It’s hard to believe we have candidates for the United States Senate who think is okey-dokey for supporters to bring guns to rallies.

It’s hard to believe we have a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives who likes to spend his free time dressing up like a Nazi and prancing around, or, actually goose-stepping.

But it’s our fault, really. We let it happen. We’re apparently too stupid to keep these morons out of races for elected office. We keep voting for them in primaries.

Yea, and not only that. A Bloomberg poll released this morning suggests that by a 2 to 1 margin likely voters in Tuesday’s election think taxes have gone up, the economy continues to sour and money given to banks to keep them from collapsing altogether and sending the nation into a full depression has been lost forever.

In fact, President Obama’s stimulus package cut taxes for middle class Americans. The economy has actually grown (meaning, slow recovery) over the past four quarters (by 2 percent in the summer quarter) and the Wall Street TARP bailout is going to earn billions in profits for the federal government.

Voters’ belief: higher taxes, failing economy, wasted money on bank bailouts.

Truth: lower taxes, growing economy, profit from TARP.

We’re dumbasses. Gee, wonder what role the Faux News Network had to play in any of that perception? Hmmm.

Election Season 2010 will go down as one of the most pathetic in history…until Election Season 2012.

PolitiFact, the Pulitzer Prize winning heroic effort of the St. Pete Times to separate fact from fiction in political campaigning gives the 2010 Election Season an overall rating of, “barely true.”

I give it an overall rating of “barely believe it’s actually happening like this.”

Tea Party? Racist? Really?

TeaPartyRacism

The GOTeaParty absolutely hates it when they get caught being racist, xenophobic, homophobic and just down right stupid and you point out how they’re being racist, xenophobic, homophobic and just down right stupid.

They get their tiddy-whities all twisted up in knots and start sputterin’ an’ cussin’ and sayin’ really smart stuff like, “I’m not a racist, you’re a racist for callin’ me a racist.”

All the while, holding a sign which reads, “Obama Agenda: White Slavery.”

It would be laughable…except it’s not.

No one knows better than the NAACP how suggesting much of the GOTeaParty rabble is caught up in the great American tradition of racism. You’ll remember how about three months ago the NAACP stirred up the hornets’ nest, including and especially the GOTeaParty propaganda ministry, Fox News, and had them yammerin’ all over themselves in defense. Futile defense but hilarious.

The GOTeaParty defense of such obvious racism and meanness has always been to claim these well-documented episodes are merely random and isolated, not really connected with the good white folks of the official GOTeaParty.

So, okay. Let’s check this out. The NAACP did exactly that and today released a report prepared by the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights which documents specific and indisputable ties between many teabagger groups and white supremacist organizations.

The report describes what it calls links between tea party factions and white supremacist groups, anti-immigrant organizations and militias, according to the Kansas City Star.

Not only have tea parties given platforms to extremists, the report states, the movement is a recruiting ground for hard-core white nationalists who are “hoping to push these (white) protesters toward a more self-conscious and ideological white supremacy.”

The report’s authors examined government documents and databases, including court cases, campaign finance reports and corporate filings, according to the Star.

“This is the first data-driven report of this type on the tea parties,” said author Devin Burghart. “Understanding their membership structures was the crucial first step that enabled us to understand the complexity of the tea party movement and to be able to specify the role of racists and bigots in the movement.”

The reports findings include:

•The St. Louis-based Council of Conservative Citizens, the largest white nationalist group in the country, has both led and promoted tea party protests. Roan Garcia-Quintana, a member of ResistNet who served as media spokesman for a 2010 Tax Day Tea Party in South Carolina, is on the national board of directors for the Council of Conservative Citizens.

•Clayton Douglas, a former information officer for the New Mexico Militia, is a member of the ResistNet tea party. He uses his profile on the ResistNet website to advertise his own “Free American” website, on which he promotes anti-Semitism.

•The Wood County Tea Party in Texas is led by a woman who used to be involved with the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.

•The 1776 Tea Party — also known as TeaParty.org — is led by Stephen Eichler, executive director of the Minuteman Project, an anti-immigrant border patrol group often referred to as vigilantes.

Maybe this doesn’t rise to the level of a senatorial candidate not understanding the separation of church & state or Mrs. Clarence Thomas drunk-dialing Anita Hill…but, still, it’s funny…except it isn’t.

Reagan raised taxes…a LOT!

Reagan2

Now that 10-10-10 has come and gone and we have to wait another year, one month and one day for 11-11-11 we can all look forward to 12-12-12 when, as we understand it, the end of the world should be just around the corner!!

But, hey, what did the Mayans know that we don’t already know? Hey, they ate themselves out of house and home.

Hum…does kinda sound familiar, though. Oh well, I’m sure the advent of President Palin in 2012 would not be any kind of harbinger or anything like that to be worried about. After all, wouldn’t she be the Second Coming – of President Reagan?

Why, yes, or at least that’s what all the right-wing radicals would have us believe. In Reagan we Trust!

As the noted philosopher, Carl the Groundskeeper, explained (paraphrased): “So, we got that goin’ for us.”

Reagan, as our libertarian-conservative hero/god, remains the ideal for many radicals today. They all want us to go back to the days of the Reagan Presidency when no one paid any taxes at all and the federal government shrank to include only one agency: the Defense Department.

What’s that you say? None of that is true? Really? It’s only a myth that Ronald Reagan cut taxes and eliminated the entire federal government when he simultaneously wiped the Soviet Union off the face of the map?

Former Wyoming Sen. Alan Simpson knew Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan was a friend of Alan Simpson’s and as co-chair of President Barack Obama’s non-partisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility & Reform he felt compelled back in the summer to set the record straight on his pal, Ronald Reagan, and taxes. Pensito Review highlighted Sen. Simpson’s remarks:

“Let’s just disengage ourselves from the myth that Ronald Reagan never raised taxes,” Simpson told the commission last summer. “He did. And here are four big ones. So I hope this will clear the air for some of the groups today.

“In 1982, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act, that rolled back about a third of his ‘81 tax cuts, raised corporate tax rates, and to a lesser extent income tax rates. Raised taxes by almost 1 percent of GDP, which at that time was the largest percentage in peacetime increase ever.

“[The] 1982 gas tax increase. [The] 1983 Greenspan commission — we know so well; [fellow commission member Alice Rivlin] remembers — we all … raised payroll taxes for lower and middle income households to higher than they were before Reagan’s ‘81 tax cuts. Then there was the 1984 deficit reduction tax.

“Those are the big four. Then there was the Railroad Retirement Revenue Act, Consolidated Omnibus Budget of ‘85… ‘85…’87 Continuing Resolution, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of ‘87, that was $8.6 billion

“So there were a lot of them. Just thought I’d throw that in.”

I get it. When the radical right-wing says, “Take America Back,” it is to the days of Reagan tax increases.

The value of 19 percent of the voters…

ValueVotersSummit

Alrighty, then! Here’s a great vision for ‘Murka:

The fundamentalist, backwoods Christians coming together with the Islamophobiacs coming together with the Tea Party curmudgeons to form a coalition promoting fear and hate of just about every dang thing we can imagine.

What fun!

The Values Voters Summit came together again in Washington this past weekend and, boy howdy, were they glad to see Tea Partiers come in to embrace their paranoia because they’d been losing steam recently given the fact that a person of color has occupied The White House for nearly two years and the Rapture hasn’t happened yet.

And so it was on this particular Sunday President Obama decided to go to church to prove, once and for all, how Muslim he really is. And it was a Kenyan Socialist church to boot!

But the good news over at the Values Voters club was despite all the chasms between the fundamentalist Christians, the Islamophobes and the tax haters they could unite behind their chosen leader for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination: Mike Pence!

Yes! Mike Pence! We’re on the road now!

Wait…wait…wait…who?

You know…Mike Pence: the four-term Republican congressman from, not making this up, Rushville, Indiana. Sure, he’s a household name.

He got 24 percent of the Value votes in the straw poll for President, outpacing last year’s winner, Mike “Huckleberry” Huckabee, who only managed 22 percent of the vote.

Mitt Romney was third with 13 percent and Eye-of-the-Newt Gingrich garnered 10 percent of the Fundamentalist-TeaParty-Islamophobe vote.

Poor Sarah Palin only received 7 percent of the vote.

She probably needs to align herself more with the star of the weekend self-love fest, Delaware Republican Senatorial Nominee Christine O’Donnell, speaking of Eye-of-the-Newt sort of things… “Those fingers in my hair; that sly come-hither stare; that strips my conscience bare…”

“Bureaucrats and politicians in Washington think they should decide what kind of lightbulb we should use, what kind of toilet we flush, what kind of car we should drive,” said the GOP senatorial nominee and high school dabbler in witchcraft.

“They even want unelected panels of bureaucrats to decide who gets what lifesaving treatment. They’ll let your teenage daughter buy an abortion but they won’t let her buy a sugary soda in a school’s vending machine.”

That’s the kind of talk that makes sense…not reality…but sense to the Armageddon crowd.

And all this effort for the support of only 19 percent of ‘Murkan voters? Well, yea, but what else do they have to occupy their time?

And, finally, the U.S. Guv’munt declared yesterday the Deepwater Horizon oil well in the Gulf of Mexico is officially, “dead.”

The Gulf of Mexico, while not officially dead still ain’t feelin’ so well.

A toast to feminine hygiene products.

Kanye

Congress returns to work this week.

We survive another 9/11 weekend, albeit with few book burnings and more than a few lackluster Tea Party rallies across ‘Murka.

Kanye West brings down the house at the MTV Video Music Awards with his latest hit, “Runaway,” and homage to feminine hygiene, “A toast to the douchebags.”

All this a coincidence?

Perhaps but how can we be sure? After all, freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose.

Fresh from fabulous vacations, er…fact-finding trips, and re-acquainting themselves with the good people back home, the Congress People will set their sights on tax cuts and small business stimulus…not necessarily in that order.

One big showdown will come over President Obama’s desire to end the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

But, no, Republicans will spend their week defending the helpless rich people against these Cretin Socialist Kenyan Zoroastrians who think, for some unknown reason, the rich should pay their fair share in taxes.

While portraying a talking head Sunday on the TeeVee Box, the Orange One, the GOP minority leader in the House, the Honorable John Boehner of Ohio’s most tanned congressional district, said he might even go along with extending tax cuts for poor working chumps like you and me…but…only if the rich get to keep their Bush tax cuts.

Yea, yea…I know. It’s really had to imagine anyone defending tax breaks for the extremely wealthy but that’s the bed in which Congressional Republicans find themselves lying because even though the very rich only account for 20 percent of the population they hold 85 percent of the nation’s wealth and that’s where Republicans get most of their campaign contributions.

It’s a good strategy because the rest of us have no money left to make political contributions.

The Democrats completely missed the mark with that, siding with the poor and barely-surviving working class…what’s left of it.

If the Republicans know anything they know money and where to find it and they do a dang fine job makin’ sure the castles are protected from the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

A toast to the douchebags.

President defend the Constitution? How dare he!!

MuslimsPray

Elvis has been dead (maybe) for only 33 years and, yet, look what this country has become:

A President of the United States can stand up, defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and you people, so torn by fear and paranoia, go berserk with angry rhetoric and condemnation.

What? The President defending the Constitution? Why, that’s…that’s…just downright un-American!

“And a baby cries…in the ghetto…” Oh Elvis, why’d you have leave us (maybe)?

Seriously, can you people hear what you’re saying?

On defending the right in the United States to worship as one pleases, Eye-of-the-Newt Gingrich said the President is “pandering to radical Islam.”

Sarah Palin refudiated the President’s defense of the Constitution by acknowledging Muslims, like everyone else, have a right to worship anywhere they please in the U.S. of A. But “should they?,” she asks.

Peter King, a Republican congressman from New York, suggested President Obama is rubbing salt in the wound of 9/ll by pointing out the Constitution defends the right to worship as we are lead to worship.

In case you’ve been under a rock since Friday or catching oil soaked shrimp in the Gulf of Mexico, the President of the United States, speaking to a gathering of Muslims celebrating the beginning of the holy month of Ramadan with a White House dinner, pointed out what every American first grader knows:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The President’s defense of basic rights just didn’t sit well with basic right-winters; hate-mongers dedicated to dividing us against ourselves at every turn. No siree Bob. We can’t have a country where all are welcomed! That just won’t do and, besides, they don’t have a clear enough message to drive people to the voting booth unless they scare the bejeebers out of us with fear and paranoia.

So, okay, let’s a few points straight:

Islam didn’t attack us on September 11, 2001. A group of extremists, criminal radicals known as Al Qaeda attacked us on September 11, 2001. They happened to be Muslim and are led by Muslim heretics.

  1. Islam didn’t attack us on September 11, 2001. A group of extremists, criminal radicals known as Al Qaeda attacked us on September 11, 2001. They happened to be Muslim and are led by Muslim heretics.
  2. Right-Wing Muslim radicals and extremists are not alone in their violent rhetoric and actions. Christian and Jewish extremists and radicals can match them word for word and, mostly, act for act.
  3. If we have any chance at all of overcoming this kind of violent action by religious heretics and dangerous thugs, we have to stand strong for the ideals which establish the very core of this great social experiment we call America. It doesn’t matter if our own radicals don’t like it very much, everyone is welcome to worship as they please.

And besides, all three great Abrahamic faiths – Jewish, Muslim & Christian – require us to acknowledge and treat as brothers and sisters those of the other faiths.

Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich and the rest of the radical paranoids have a right in America to say whatever they wish about others…but should they?

Tax the rich? Why…why…that’s UnAmerican!!

MonopolyRichMan

Is this an amazing country or what?

In what other country would you hear folks, barely able to make it from paycheck to paycheck, get all worked up over wantin’ to make sure really, really rich folks aren’t taxed too much?

And, yet, that’s what you’ll be hearin’ soon as – inexplicably – Republican in the Congress of the United States will argue against letting die the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest two percent of Americans.

Why the debate would even take place is an amazing thing; kinda like debatin’ the act of driving one’s car off the cliff.

And you can bet the Republicans, wanting to preserve their base of the richest of the rich, will try their best to rally the poor lemmings driving those cars on which they can barely make payments right over that cliff.

What? Make the rich actually pay taxes? Or pay their fair share? Why…why…that’s just un-American!

Heck, all you unwashed and ignert trailer-dwellers, don’t you know that if the rich get all these enormous tax breaks they were given by George W. Bush and the Republican Congress they’ll use all that extra money to create jobs for you? They might even just cut out the middle-man and write checks directly to you! They’re nice like that.

Nevermind those tax cuts, passed by Bush and the Republican Congress back in 2004, would cost America another $700 billion in debt. Nevermind that the tax cuts combined with unbelievable spending and folly in Iraq and Afghanistan cost an additional $1 trillion. Nevermind that the tax cuts, folly in Iraq and deregulated greed on Wall Street drove – may yet drive – this nation into collapse.

The shock is good for us, say the Milton Friedman disciples who planned all this. It’s good for us to amass great wealth in the hands of a very few. See how well this has worked out?

You see, it is like this: In the United States, wealth is highly concentrated in a relatively few hands.

The top 1 percent of households – the really, really rich – own 34.6% of all privately held wealth, according to Professor G. William Domhoff of the University of California at Santa Cruz. The next 19 percent – Wall Street bankers and corporation heads – own 50.5 percent of the wealth.

That means 20 percent of all Americans own 85 percent of all privately-held wealth in the country. This, of course, leaves only 15 percent of the wealth for the remaining 80 percent of us.

So you can easily see why it’s a great idea to extend the Bush tax cuts for those very wealthy people. Heck, they’re barely making it in this economy.

But, wait, what’s this? A dedicated Friedmanista, the very architect of no less than Ronald Reagan’s wealthy supply-side revolution says extending the Bush tax cuts would be a bad thing.  David Stockman, budget director for President Ronald Reagan says tax cuts for the wealthy have become a religion for Republicans.

“I find it unconscionable that the Republican leadership faced with a 1.5 trillion deficit could possibly believe that good public policy is to maintain tax cuts for the top 2 percent of the population who, after all, have benefited enormously from this phony boom we’ve had over the last 10 years as a result of the casino on Wall Street,” Stockman told National Public Radio over the weekend.

“I blame the Bush White House. They basically sold out the birthright of the Republican Party when they bailed out Wall Street unnecessarily in a state of complete panic in September 2008. That’s really, at the end of the day, one of the greatest misfortunes in fiscal governance since the Reagan revolution tried to straighten things out beginning in 1980.”

To be fair, Stockman also blames the Obama White House for continuing some of the same policies in an effort to, as the President says, get the nation out of the ditch.

Maybe the Republicans could find more common ground with regular Americans if they replaced, “Drill, baby, drill,” with, “Tax, baby, tax…the rich.”

Yea…that’ll happen.

The well is dead? 14th Amendment, too?

GulfOilRig

“Ding Dong! The Well is dead. Which old well? The Wicked Well!
Ding Dong! The Wicked Well is dead.
Wake up, you sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.
Ding Dong, the Wicked Well is dead. It’s gone where the goblins go,
Below – below – below. Yo-ho, let’s open up and sing and ring the bells out.
Ding Dong’ the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low.
Let them know
The Wicked Well is dead!”

Or so, they tell us.

Not that we doubt them, of course. They’ve been so accurate and truthful in the past.

And following up on the news that static clings…er…kills and mud jams have permanently killed the Deepwater Horizon Well, the guv’munt says everything’s gonna be okay.

“The government is expected to announce on Wednesday that three-quarters of the oil from the Deepwater Horizon leak has already evaporated, dispersed, been captured or otherwise eliminated — and that much of the rest is so diluted that it does not seem to pose much additional risk of harm,” reports today’s New York Times.

Even the President of the United States and the First Family will take a brief vacation to the Gulf Coast this weekend. I guess. Is that still on?

Nevermind, we can all go home now…those of us who still have homes…and jobs…and a way of life…and, okay, we still don’t know for sure how much damage this catastrophe has caused nor what permanent damage has been done to the Gulf of Mexico and its vast diversity of life.

I guess all that’s left are criminal charges and enormous fines!

But in the meantime, we can go back to hating each other.

Speaking of which, here come the Republicans, ever trying to top themselves for creating division and spawning fear and hatred just in time for elections!

We have some of Capitol Hill’s top GOPers saying maybe it’s time to revisit – or eliminate entirely – the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

You know the 14th Amendment, of course, it’s the one which reads, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

It’s also the one with the Equal Protection Clause which keeps states from enacting laws to discriminate against groups of people they don’t like. Its Due Process Clause says the Bill of Rights apply to everyone setting foot in the United States of America.

The 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868, right after the Civil War by a Congress seeking to overturn the infamous Dred Scott Decision of the Supreme Court which held slaves – African-Americans – were not nor could ever be citizens of the land which held them in slavery.

But the ranking Republican in today’s U.S. Senate, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said over the weekend maybe it’s time to revisit that amendment. His sentiments were echoed by John Kyl of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

“I haven’t made a final decision about it, but that’s something that we clearly need to look at,” McConnell told The Hill newspaper.

Yes, yes indeed. And, hey senators, while you’re at it why not revisit the whole issue of slavery, too? Maybe what this country needs is another good civil war! Maybe that would excite the Republican base!

Seriously, are these people living in the same century as you and me?

Political bullies are nothing new.

bullies

As Tropical Storm Bonnie lies over the ocean…crosses South Florida and, over the weekend, the Gulf of Mexico, the oil spill site and Looziana, it gives one pause to consider bullies.

Tropical storms and hurricanes are meteorological bullies.

The only difference between hurricanes and human bullies is hurricanes can do real damage.

Human bullies are usually just thugs; insecure brats who act out because of deep, empty holes in their souls. They only time they do any real damage is if they actually gain some sort of power: political or financial.

Think dictators, fascists, greedy money traders, giant corporations, oligarchs, plutarchs.

American political history is rife with bullies. The corporate barons of the gilded age, come to mind; Sen. Joe McCarthy. Father Charles Caughlin was the first political bully of the mass communications age. These were all 20th Century phenomena.

This current crop of bullies in the 21st Century is no different, really. Sure, they have their own network at Fox. But they’re really no different than any others in history.

Limbaugh, Beck, Ingram, Breitbart, Hannity, Savage, O’Reilly…they’re all just bullies. They make a lot of money, of course, because heavy corporate interests use them to advance the agenda of middle-class destruction and wealth distribution – up to the wealthy and corporate interests.

But they’re really just bullies. This Breitbart thug and his cronies at Fox did some real damage this week, bullying the Obama Administration, the NAACP and a fine public servant, Shirley Sherrod. But they’ve done it before. Think Van Jones, ACORN. Think racists bullies…which is, of course, redundant.

It’s a shameful history repeating itself.

FDR has his bully faction to deal with (Not to be confused with TR’s bully pulpit!)

FDR had the American Liberty League. Formed in 1934, the Liberty League was funded by the Dupont Family and their corporate buddies to oppose labor unions and FDR’s New Deal policies.

Supporters included U.S. Steel, General Motors, General Foods, Standard Oil, Colgate, Heinz Foods, Chase National Bank, Goodyear Tire and Rubber and many other corporate giants of the day.

The league rallied support for the conservative-dominated U.S. Supreme Court to overturn FDR’s agenda. (Remember the court-packing episode in FDR’s tenure?) A suggestion exists they even tried to stage a coup.

The only difference between then and now is that many of the prominent leaguers were Democrats. Al Smith, the Democratic nominee for president in 1928 was a leader, as was Dean Acheson, who would become Harry Truman’s Secretary of State, and 1924 Democratic nominee John W. Davis.

The effort died out in 1940. The greater good at the time was served so much better by FDR’s reforms and actions than by continued greed.

But the message was much the same then as now: “defend and uphold the Constitution, lower taxes, more freedom.” Hollow bromides masking the real intent: power to exploit.

They certainly had their way, got much of what they wanted during the Bush years. Now, we’re cleaning up the mess – financial calamity, oil in the Gulf of Mexico, two needless wars, massive federal debt.

The bullies of today would rather we keep the mess. It’s easier to exploit a society in shock and chaos.